I Admire Islam but a Devout Hindu

mac says: November 10, 2014 at 3:24 am

islamYes Islam is the best religion bcoz what u said above is not Islamic, Islam permitted to take 4 wives, where as you people are involved in adutery, your gods even married thousands of girls -mac

sid says: November 10, 2014 at 5:33 pm

Mr. Mac, no religion can claim to be the best in the world. Each n every religion has its own shortcomings, what we need to do is work on these shortcomings rather than pointing towards other religions.

SRK, a Muslim?
SRK, a Muslim?
I had a very extreme view on Islam, but then, I was very less informed so I decided to read Quran and find more facts about Mohammed salah-islam, of course with the help of my Muslim friend. I got to know some interesting things, which changed my perception about Islam.

In one site I was going through some one pointed out that Mohammed(peace be upon him) had married ayesha aged 9 and had 22 marriages. Well these we’re symbolic marriages meant to correct a few wrong practicies, and many are not aware of this.

I admire Islam the way my friend interpreted it, although he said there are other interpretations some of which are faulty. The concept of jihad is sacred, the struggle of Mohammed(peace be upon him) in his early years is a classic example of jihad. Jihad means striving, but the sad truth is some people are using barberic things in the name of jihad and islam.

What I ask of Muslim community is to reach out others n explain them the truth. If people are confused about Islam, its not their fault, its more like, if a kid doesn’t understand maths, the teacher makes the kid understand, so isn’t it the responsibility of Muslim community to explain to others what Islam is really about. In this context, I would say Indian Muslim community is doing a pretty good job.

Durga_Puja_celebrationNow comes the next part, I admire islam and I love Mohammed(peace be upon him) but I still am a devout Hindu. Mac I don ask u to love Hinduism, but at least respect it, peoples sentiments are connected to it, same goes for all other religions. But yes if u do hate a religion then go read everything about it, then hate. Even I had the same intention, I wanted to find faults in Islam by reading more about it, but somehow I find more good in it.

Remember one thing, you dont need a reason to love, but u need at least one reason to hate. Every religion is at fault, we need to accept and bring the change.
Hindus n Muslim s share many things as common..
La Allah ilallah-there is but one god
Ekam Brahman-the one supreme Brahman -Sid


Also read: VIDEO: Interfaith Marriage with Equality, Akansha unwillingly converted to Nusrat, Hindu-Muslim marriages, Hindu-Muslim lovers’ experiences, Hindu girl-Muslim boy, Idols, pluralism, SRK-can you do it?, Zakir Naik, Christian-Hindu marriages, Jain-Muslim marriages, Brahmin-Muslim marriages, Bollywood and Interfaith Marriages.
Return to Home, Blogs, How to Share? Facebook, Youtube, Twitter, Book, Media.

29 Comments

  • November 22, 2014 5:04 am

    Dear fellow readers,

    The stupid Mac like persons never give serious thoughts about THE CRIMINAL LAWS OF ALLAH against humanity.

    1. Killing, murder, slaughter of all infidels that have not converted to Islam.

    2. Killing, murder, slaughter of all apostates of Islam.

    3. Islam orders death for Muslims and possible death for non-Muslim critics of Muhammad and the Quran and even sharia itself.

    4. Muslims deserve death for doing any of the following (Reliance of the Traveler pp. 597—98, o8.7): (1) Reviling Allah or his Messenger; (2) being sarcastic about ‘Allah’s name, His command, His interdiction, His promise, or His threat’; (3) denying any verse of the Quran or ‘anything which by scholarly consensus belongs to it, or to add a verse that does not belong to it’; (4) holding that ‘any of Allah’s messengers or prophets are liars, or to deny their being sent’; (5) reviling the religion of Islam; (6) being sarcastic about any ruling of the Sacred Law; (7) denying that Allah intended ‘the Prophet’s message . . . to be the religion followed by the entire world.’

    5. Islam allows the ownership of slaves – it is a law of ALLAH.

    6.ALLAH permits the raping of female slaves. Indeed in Islam – rape is not a sexual weapon – it is a weapon of war. Having murdered the woman’s man, Muslims can now – sanctioned by the law of ALLAH complete their final humiliation and domination of her body.

    7.ALLAH sanctions the seizing, looting and pillaging of property of murdered infidels.

    8. ALLAH demands a share of the proceeds realized from the sale of women and children and looted property. It is the law of ALLAH.

    9. ALLAH condemns most Muslim women upon their death to the fires of hell.

    10. The ALLAH depicted in the Koran is no ordinary god. He is the greatest slut master of the entire universe. ALLAH has created a deviant sexual paradise filled with virgins with big breasts and lustrous eyes. These virgins re- generate as virgins every time a believer has sex with them. These righteous Muslim killers and murderers of ALLAH are blessed with eternal erections. They are permitted by ALLAH to engage in all forms of orgies, group sex, and sexual depravity.

    11. ALLAH permits the following crimes to be committed in His name and greater glory. (1) Women and children are enslaved. They can either be sold, or the Muslims may ‘marry’ the women, since their marriages are automatically annulled upon their capture. (2) Muslims may have sex with slave women. Ali, Muhammad’s cousin and son—in—law, did this. (3) Women and children must not be killed during war, unless this happens in a nighttime raid when visibility was low. Not as an act of mercy but as a commercial decision. They are money and sex on the hoof. (4) Old men and monks could be killed. (5) A captured enemy of war could be killed, enslaved, ransomed for money or an exchange, freely released, or beaten. One time Muhammad even tortured a citizen of the city of Khaybar in order to extract information about where the wealth of the city was hidden. (6) Enemy men who converted could keep their property and small children. This law is so excessive that it amounts to forced conversion. Only the strongest of the strong could resist this coercion and remain a non—Muslim. (7) Civilian property may be confiscated. (8) Civilian homes may be destroyed. (9) Civilian fruit trees may be destroyed. (10) Pagan Arabs had to convert or die. This does not allow for the freedom of religion or conscience. (11) People of the Book (Jews and Christians) had three options (Sura 9:29): fight and die; convert and pay a forced ‘charity’ or zakat tax; or keep their Biblical faith and pay a jizya or poll tax. The last two options mean that this immoral money flows into the Islamic treasury, to fund Muhammad’s jihadist army so why would Muhammad receive a revelation from God to dry up this money flow?

    12. ALLAH rewards suicide bombers and other killers and murderers Islamic martyrdom which guarantees Paradise to those who “kill and are killed” for Allah.

    13. All unbelievers are to be sentenced to Hell for all eternity.

    14. Murder is only wrong if the victim is a fellow Muslim.

    15. ALLAH teaches that women are fields to be used by men as they will.

    16. ALLAH teaches that women are worth one half of a man.

    17. ALLAH sanctions men to beat their disobedient wives.

    18. ALLAH does not allow Muslims to be friends with the infidels.

    19. ALLAH sanctions that Muslims must disown family members who reject Islam.

    20. Thieves have their hands cut off.

    21. ALLAH ordered that prisoners of war must be killed until all Arabia was conquered for Islam.

    22. ALLAH sent the Angel Gabriel with his merry band of warrior Angels to bring war, death and destruction to the enemies of Islam.

    23. ALLAH created a law allowing Muhammad to marry his adopted son’s wife. This law applied to all Muslim men.

    24. ALLAH created a law abolishing adoption.

    25. ALLAH created a law allowing Muhammad to rape slave women.

    26. ALLAH created a law allowing Muhammad to possess more then 4 wives.

    Of course, these are not the teachings of ALLAH (the ANTI GOD.) These are the teachings of Muhammad. The ALLAH of the Koran never existed. He was created by Muhammad.

  • November 14, 2014 8:13 am

    Dear readers,

    Muslims lie when it is in their interest to do so and “Allah” will not hold them accountable for lying when it is beneficial to the cause of Islam. They can lie without any guilt or fear of accountability or retribution. A lie in the defense of Islam is approved even applauded in their “holy” books.

    Muslims are permitted to lie: (1) to save their lives, (2) to reconcile a husband and wife, (3) to persuade a woman into a bedroom and (4) to facilitate one on his journey. Muslims are even permitted to disavow Islam and Mohammed if it is not a genuine heart-felt rejection. Muslims will tell you that concealment of a truth is not an abandonment of that truth if it benefits Islam.

    Mohammed gave permission for a follower to lie in order to kill a Jewish poet who had offended Mohammed. I could provide many examples of permissible lying from the Koran and Hadith and will do so when my critics accuse me of hatred and bigotry because of this column. My motives are not important but the truth is. However, many unprincipled people do not consider truth important. It is political correctness that sits on the throne to be worshiped.

    Muslims may appear very sincere; in fact, they are sincere, when they lie for their own protection or in the cause of Islam. They have permission to lie. Yes, Christians have also lied but never are they given permission to lie. However, a Muslim has no guilt since the Koran and Hadith permit his deception.

  • November 13, 2014 6:16 am

    Dear fellow readers,

    After a gap of months, I am posting text on Halala in Islam.I would liketo cast a glance at the verses of the Holy Qura’n which are today interpreted to play with the sacred laws laid down by Allah, and imported from it Halala of today. The Quran says in 2/230:

    2/230
    “And if he divorces her finally, she shall thereafter not be lawful unto him unless if she marries another man. If (by chance this marriage also breaks) and the present husband divorces her, there shall be no sin upon either of them (the first husband and the divorced wife) to remarry—provided that both of them think that they will be able to be within the bounds set by Allah: and these are the bounds of Allah which He makes clear unto people of innate knowledge.”

    A man of even ordinary intelligence can glean from these verses a reprimand to the man, who is going to finally divorce his wife. In doing so, he is acknowledging the fact that she will henceforth be a free individual and can choose to engage herself and marry any man of his choice. The verse implies a warning that the conjugal and marital bonds will be cut asundered and the return will not be possible. At least not within foreseeable future, as she will be Halal, lawful for the first husband only if she gets married to another person, shares a conjugal relationship with him and gets divorced through the same elaborate process. It will be a mockery if the former husband, realizing his mistake of discarding and divorcing his wife unmindful of the consequences, stage-manages a marriage of his former wife to another person in order to contrive legitimacy for his reunion with her. It is simply inconceivable from the Qur’anic point of view as it reduces the women to the status of a plaything who can be discarded through stupid and rapid-fire utterances of Talaaq and brought back to himself after a one-night stand with a stranger. To expect that such a fraudulent method would be sanctioned by the Qur’an is in itself a fallacious understanding of the spirit of the Divine Revelation and the status of women in the Qur’an. How could The Qur’an undermine the dignity and self esteem of a woman whom it holds equal to man?

    In fact, the Halala is the obnoxious corollary of the allowance of triple Talaaq that has found favour with the today’s interpreters. One farce has led to another sham. The actual process of Talaaq mentioned in the Holy Quran chapter 4 verse 34 is neither preached nor taught to the general Muslim masses. Nor even the scholars of today know it directly from the Qur’an. They only know their man-made Fiqh and issue fatwas.

    We need to look at the Qur’anic procedure of Talaaq afresh. In 4/34 & 35, The Qur’an clearly lays down that in the event of any differences or discord of serious nature between husband and wife, the husband has to admonish her first to get the things in shape. If she does not mend her ways, the husband is suggested to leave her alone in bed. If the problem persists, according to some scholars, the husband may punish her if necessary. And according to some scholars, it will be made plain to the lady that the next course of action would be to the appointment of two arbiters which can make the matter known to outsiders.

    If the patch-up still does not materialize, the Holy Qur’an lays down the prerequisite of the appointment of an arbiter each from the bride’s and the groom’s families. By this, now both the families will be active in preventing the divorce. It is now fervently hoped that God will repair the bonds between them and cordiality would return. If still all these steps fail, the husband may proceed to divorce her first time.

    If there is reunion between them, there will be no break of marriage. But if reunion doesn’t occur, next month this first divorce will become second. And if during these three months, problem remains unsolved and no physical contact, there will be final divorce and separation.

    In case the separation becomes inevitable, the Qur’an ordains to appoint 2 reliable persons to witness financial, material and residential issues in 65/6. Once separation takes place, the responsibility of food, housing, medical and education will fall upon the father of the children. Post-separation custody of, access to and maintenance of kids is hardly taken care of nor preached by these self-appointed custodians of the religion.

    If the separated wife is pregnant, according to 2/233, the financial responsibility of her health, residence and all other expenses will be on the ex-husband till the delivery of the child. If the ex-husband, i.e. the father of the new born wants to get the infant nursed and breast feed by the divorced mother, he has to bear the responsibility of housing, food, clothing, healthcare and remuneration not more than 2 years. The financial responsibilities for both, the mother and the new born will rest with the father of the child.

    The divorced ladies have to avoid next marriage at least for three months or duration of three menstrual periods according to 2/228. During this period, all the expenditure will be borne by the ex-husband. He has to provide the residence on par with the standard they maintained when they were married. The final statement on Talaaq appears in verse first verse of chapter 65. The name of this Surah is At-Talaaq: itself.

    65/1

    “O Prophet! (say to your people that) when you intend to divorce women, divorce them at their prescribed periods, and keep counting of the prescribed period, and be conscious of ALLAH, your Sustainer. Do not expel them from their homes; and neither shall they (be made to) leave unless they become openly guilty of immoral conduct. These are the bounds set by ALLAH – and he who transgresses the bounds set by ALLAH does indeed sin against himself …..”

    The verse quoted above says that three Talaaqs at one go is allowed only in the case of adultery. In such case a husband can’t wait for a time bound process of divorce. This is also very much natural as no husband can withstand a cumbersome process in the event of open lewdness and the revulsion emanating from it.

    The pity is that the so-called scholars don’t know there are 4 essential steps to be taken into consideration before pronouncing first Talaaq. They never propagate this nor the procedure of periodical Talaaq. And finally either they don’t know or they want to keep the male section of the Muslims in dark about the provision of providing residence to the divorced lady for the prescribed period to pass for another marriage. If this has been known to the public, millions of divorce cases could not have happen. In fact persons not having another accommodation have to move out of their homes to allow the lady to pass the stipulated period. Even the scholars don’t preach that all the responsibilities of the children rest with the father only in the case of divorce and lady will be free to marry any person. They only disclose to the public how to kick out the wife mercilessly in helpless condition in the name of The Most Gracious and Bountiful God, God of Universe, God of women-folk too.

    Thanks for sparing your time to read.

  • November 12, 2014 5:34 am

    Dear readers,

    Mr.Massey in his latest text has rightly pointed out evil practices prevailing in Islam.If any one has objection, it should be justified with logical reasons. In real life sitation the position of muslim girls is very worse.

    Islam was born out of the brutal rape of a little girl. As the mother of the Sunni Caliphate, Aisha is not just an incidental figure. Her marriage to Mohammed lies at the heart of Islam. The alliance between her father and her abuser made Islam viable by giving its prophet his first real power base. After Mohammed’s death, her father used that connection to the Chief Prophet of Islam, to gain the political upper hand over Mohammed’s son-in-law in the civil war that arose afterward. And it was her father who oversaw the codification of the Koran in its written form.

    The spread of the Islamic faith and the codification of the Koran were made possibly only through the rape of a little girl. And there is no way around that. Which is why child abuse remains a permanent part of Islam. To disavow it, is to disavow Islam’s Prophet and his successor, whom Sunni Islam associates with the codification of their religion’s holiest book. Muslims cannot tolerate gently mocking cartoons of their prophet. They certainly are not about to put him aside so that no more 9 year old girls get raped.

    And how could they? One of the most awful Hadiths[3] depicts Aisha’s mother taking her from her swing set, wiping her face and then bringing her inside and putting her on Mohammed’s lap. While everyone else left, Mohammed “consummated” his marriage with her. Another describes her friends coming over to play with dolls… after her marriage. Still another mentions that she had originally played with his own children.

    There is nothing terribly new here. Child abuse predates Islam. It is not uncommon in the West. But in Islam, it is an organic part of the religion itself. Even when Muslims attempt to inhibit it, they must resort to convoluted arguments that Mohammed was given special sanctions to do what he did, because he was on another level than ordinary men. And so they cannot condemn the act itself, only distinguish between Mohammed’s “high-minded” sort of child abuse and that of ordinary people.

    But Aisha is only the most notable example of the exploitation of women and little girls that was a major factor in the rise of Islam.

    Islam was not only born out of the rape of Aisha, but out of the rape and slavery of countless women[4] captured by Mohammed’s forces. The rape and abuse of those women was a recruitment tool for Islam. While Muslims who fight to conquer and subjugate non-Muslims are promised 72 virginal demon women in paradise, for many of the practically minded that was not enough incentive. They wanted their reward now. Mohammed’s forces looted the property of those they conquered and subjugated. But also kidnapped and sexually abused their wives and daughters.

    When some of his men objected to raping married women in the presence of their husbands, Mohammed received one of his ever convenient revelations from Allah, which dissolved the marriages of captured women making it completely legal under Islamic law and morality for them to be raped. This is not just some ancient practice, it is used as sanction today to justify the rape of married women in the parts of the world both under and not under Islamic law.

  • sid
    November 11, 2014 7:00 am

    Dear admin, I feel very honoured that my views found a voice in this site. To your question, whether I took the sahadah oath, my answer is no I didn’t. My not taking the oath doesn’t mean I don’t believe in Islam or I don’t admire Mohammed (peace be upon him), what I’m saying is, it is more important to believe, and expressing that belief. Even if I don’t convert, I would still be a ‘sache imaan waala’ a musalman, believing in god and being a good human is more important to me. These are strictly my views,no offence to anyone.

    Whatever you said about the excluvist view is absolutely correct and needs to be changed. But in this context I would say Indian and Turkish muslim communities are very tolerant and modern. Indian Muslims draw a stark contrast between the moderate Hindus and the extremist Hindus, and I think the same thing has to be reciprocated by the Hindu community, we Hindus have to make a difference between the excluvists,you talked about and the moderate muslims. This will not only encourage the moderate Muslim community to spread their moderate interpretation of Islam,an interpretation of that I admire,an interpretation of peace and tollerence. Today most people don’t know what Islam means, it means ‘peace’.

    Respect each others religion. Religions are meant to be the paths of salvation for humans,these all different paths,Hinduism,Islam,Christianity,Buddhism and all other paths,they lead to the same destination. When our goal is one, then why make differences and fight?

    • Mohammed
      November 11, 2014 8:34 am

      Dear bro .,

      we respect you and ur religion but mac is doing very well job in this site
      people like massey and fake members..they r spoiling our religion in this site…by commenting lie things and harm thing of our religion while we want to give you understand and explaniation of our religion……
      so dont mistake us

      • sid
        November 12, 2014 6:12 am

        Dear Mohammed,
        I agree with you on this, many Hindus actually use more than harsh words and many a times violence against other religions. I would also agree onthe admins defence.
        Let’s assume a scenario, and please bear with my assumptions.
        Let’s say 10 Hindus come to this site and 5 write offensive things and go. Then will u blame all the Hindus or just the 5, its logical to blame 5,foolish to blame all. Out of these 5 who offend, 2 of them are Hindu extremists and cannot tolerate anything except Hinduism, and the rest 3 are misinformed about Islam.

        Now comes the retaliation part from the guys who love Islam. These guys offend Hinduism in return.

        And then starts a furious verbal spat between these two groups. Each group accusing each others religion of all the nasty things you could imagine of.

        Now because terroristdidiots,’note I said 5 idiots not 5 Hindus’ a big spat started,followed by utter hatred towards Islam and Hinduism. My point is why blame Hinduism for this? Similarly if the case is reversed and those 5 were Muslims offending Hinduism,still why blame Islam over it?

        If anyone who is to be blamed or punished it is those 5 people not their religion. The fault of these 5 doesn’t make the entire 10 criminals or their religion a criminal religion. Similarly the wrongdoings of the terrorists doesn’t make Islam bad. There are no such as one as Muslim terrorists or Hindu terrorists or Christian terrorists, there are just terrorists, their religion doesn’t matter.The wrong and evil things they do,thats what defines them,not their religion.

        On our part we should force these people to stop offending others in the name of religion or god.

        Dear Mac

        I respect your love for islam,and dont worry I’m not among those people who divert the topic or run away from debates.

        Hoping that you have read everything above,including my 5 people example, now out of those 5,the 3 misinformed people I mentioned about,you know these people could be made to understand the realities.
        But instead of that you try to engage them in an offensive way. Giving hatred for hatred is not a solution. Because of your comments,even the good Hindus/christians/etc may get a bad impression.

        Inform people who don’t know,don’t fight with them. Change your ways mac,just an advice,no offence.

        And just to let u knw what happens when you try to make people understand: I was also among those 3 people(totally misinformed)
        But one of my friends changed me, apart from my own study of Quran.
        And a request, please don’t quote unnecessary things,firstly these can be interpreted in many ways and secondly you should say something only when you understand it inside out.once again, no offence,just a request.

        • Mohammed
          November 12, 2014 8:56 am

          Dear sid. . .

          5 people or whole people..it doesnt matter. . .but they r spoiling our religion …for example – if you kill 1 person or 100 it doesnt matter..but main part is you have killed…. thats the matter. . like wise also this… ok
          Untill they stop.. we cant stop…

          its also ur duty to stop them. . y u r not stoping them and blaming to our comments…

    • Mohammed
      November 11, 2014 8:42 am

      you have told that all the religion lead to same destination
      but why most of the hindu people are only spoiling to Islam..why??
      in this site you will see most spoiling and harming post and comments only of Islamic religion…why ??
      while this admin support cristians,jews and all other religion except islam. .why??
      why he is always against to islam..why???

      • November 11, 2014 7:34 pm

        Muhammad,

        We don’t agree to your statement “most of the hindu people are only spoiling to Islam”. It is like saying most of Muslims are terrorists, and that is NOT TRUE. There are 1 billion Hindus and if 15 of them write against Islam on this site, how can you interpret it as “most of the Hindu…”?

        Again, this is not true “admin support christians, jews and all other religion except islam”. Tell us what is wrong in what we wrote to Sid?

        We are here to promote Interfaith Marriage with EQUALITY (50%-50%). Like SRK, Salman, Seema, Shamim and Saif, if a Hindu-Muslim couple wishes to live happily, we have no issue with it. Do you approve equality of two faiths for an interfaith couple?

        • Mohammed
          November 12, 2014 9:21 am

          you agree or not admin..but its right…

          iam not talking about what you have wrote to sid
          iam talking about what you are posting in this site
          because when they are going against and spoiling to our religion you are keeping silent and not respond to any one
          but if we are doing same thing or give right things of our religion..
          u r blaming to us..

          Like mac bro said you wont reply or you come up with different tolerence topic

          Shame on you admin.
          By the name of eqaulity u r spoiling islam religion…..

          • November 13, 2014 7:09 am

            We are here to talk about interfaith marriages with equality. We feel ALL books are written and printed by humans. For interfaith couples, it is not that critical what is written in books but what is going on streets today.

            mac and Muhammad, is equality (50%-50%, especially in raising children) possible amongst Hindu-Muslim couples? What is done by Salman, SRK, Seema, Shamim, Saif is something admirable as far Islam is concerned? We think so. Let us know what are your views.

    • November 11, 2014 7:18 pm

      Sid,

      You deserve all honors for sharing such deep thoughts on religions. This world needs more people like you. We hope you will hang on with us for years to come.

      We are just like you, we are also “’sache imaan waala’ a musalman”. For that we believe one doesn’t need Shahadah and glorifying Muhammad (PBUH). Allah is important, not as much the messengers or that Shahadah ritual. In addition, we love Jesus (PBUH), however we believe one doesn’t have to have baptism and attend church every Sunday. Same way we love Krishna (PBUH) messages in Geeta; but again, one doesn’t have to go to Arya Samaj and have namashanskara ritual label to be start calling now on-wards as Hindu. Buddha (PBUH)’s teachings are superb! Likewise, we also love Gandhi (PBUH) and work of Mother Teresa (PBUher). Do you see where we are going…? We believe (assume just like Sid (PBUyou)) in remaining free-spirited and not get boxed into an odd size thing called “religion” (NO BBS).

      We have visited Turkey (99% Muslims) and impressed by their moderate views towards Islam and world. We further agree to you about many Indian Muslims (like SRK, Salman, Seema, Shamim, Iftekhar, and more).

      Even we have great respect for our mac (PBUH; who is intelligent, honest, coming from a good family, believes performing namaz 5 times a day is not critical, his mother is a professional and not in hijab/burka, believes Krishna bhakt Gandhi will go to heaven even Gandhi is not a Muslim, and more). Actually mac did not cared much about Islam till 9-11. However, currently he is in a fighting mode and out to shut off every one’s mouth that speaks against Islam. Once he matures, he will realize that such exclusivity and fighting back will only increase hostility, and nothing more. We are confident that after 20 years, he will be just like Iftekhar (and hope not like Osama Bin Laden!).

      • mac
        November 12, 2014 3:06 am

        you again made things up, you said you i didn`t care about islam when i before 9/11, i was (4-9) when 9/11 took place, ya , i didn`t gave you chance to calculate my exact age as you will make another thing if u get me exact age, so don`t ask me why i gave age limit(5-10), coming to your question, to be honest, i started to reallu learn about islam when i came to this site, when i saw people saying abot FMG,wedding night bleeding,sodomy etc, and when i checked it and found nothing then i realised that there is a lie going on this site

      • sid
        November 12, 2014 6:15 am

        I’m sorry posts are painfully long. Please do have some patience and read it all.

  • November 11, 2014 6:23 am

    At least 48 school students have been killed in Nigeria after a suicide bomber apparently dressed in school uniform detonated explosives in a packed assembly meeting.

    Around 2,000 students – some as young as 11 – were waiting to hear the principal’s Monday morning address when the blast ripped through the crowd. Eyewitnesses spoke of horrific scenes as body parts were scattered all over the school compound. The mood then turned to anger, with soldiers who turned up to secure the area pelted with rocks by locals, who accused them of failing to protect the area against terrorist attack.

    The bombing took place at the Government Technical Science College in the city of Potiskum, a town of 200,000 in north-east Nigeria’s Yobe state and a regular target of attacks by the Boko Haram Islamist group. Only last week, a suicide bomb in the same city killed 30 people taking part in a religious procession of moderate Muslims.

    Musa Ibrahim Yahaya, survivor of the school bombing, spoke to the AP news agency from his hospital bed, where he was being treated for head wounds. “We were waiting for the principal to address us, around 7:30 a.m., when we heard a deafening sound and I was blown off my feet,” he said. “People started screaming and running, I saw blood all over my body.”

    Aliyu Abubakar, a Potiskum resident, said he heard the explosion when he was dropping off his two sons at a nearby Islamic college. “One of my sons fell down, I came out dragged him in and we drove off back home,” he said.

  • November 11, 2014 6:15 am

    Mr. Mac,

    What best, why and how? Islam is a criminal religion, treating female only sex object, discriminatory attitude towards them.

    Mutta, halala, bleeding on wedding night are the criminal practices against females in islam. If a found is found involved in adjultery, she is stonned to death, but mullas, imams and maulvies involved in adultery, mutta and halala practices, they are never stonned to death. Has any imam or mulla been stonned to death involved in sodomy in madarasas?72 virgins for terrorists dying in blasts and war?

    Sex with dead wife, keeping women in burqa, oral tripple talak, males allowed to keep 4 wives, 4 witnesses needed to prove rape to get justice by women. Every time males need virgin wife, why not male?
    What about yourself when sodomized, did you file complaint?

    What is happening in islamic country? every where chaos, murder, killing, war, sex slave girls, being auctioned openly.More than 2000 terrorist organization are being run by islamic countries,kids are being brain washed to use them as Human bomb?

    THIS CANNOT BE A RELIGION? RELIGION PRECHES PEACE, HARMONY, NON
    VIOLENCE. RAPIST MOHMAMAD PREACHED VIOLENCE, SEX, RAPE, KILLING AND MURDER. HE DID NOT SPARE HIS SON,S WIFE, 9 YEAR OLD GIRL.

  • November 10, 2014 8:22 pm

    Sid,

    We love your pluralistic views. Welcome to this site. Please do come often to guide others.

    Before we go further, we have a question. Did you took Shahadah oath? Why? why not?

    Problem comes in religion when people start believing that every single word written in a book is the direct message from God and to be followed literally. Further, they go to defend their book at any length to prove their claim for 100% truth in the book. They also end up criticizing other’s faith/beliefs because, in their minds, there cannot be two truths. This is what creates 9-11.

    We are with you when you said, “La Allah ilallah – there is but one god” but you left out a major important piece, that is “.. Muhammadur-Rasulullah – and Muhammad is the (final) messenger of God”. You interpreted as “there is but one god”, while others may interpret it as “There is absolutely no deity worthy of worship except Allah”. This is where problem start in any interfaith talk. Is Jesus’ cross idol? Is Krishna murti an idol? Is the Kaaba stone cube an idol? Is (the final) messenger Jesus, Krishna, Mahavir, Buddha or Muhammad? Are all these messengers of Allah? A pluralist will answer, YES or may be, however an exclusivist cannot tolerate any other names (or form or way) but theirs as the most (only) important. Basically, the exclusivist is telling us that there is only one God and that is MINE!!

    We hope to talk to your more, stay tuned!

Leave A Comment